Catilinae Coniuratio

Sallust

Sallust (I BC) · Coni intro.p1 · perseus-eng2 · More by Sallust (I BC)

Choose a text id="mobileReaderAuthor" class="mobile-reader-author" href="/authors/sallust" aria-label="More works by Sallust (I BC)"> â€”

â‹¯

Primary version Secondary version

Original / primary: Perseus Eng2

intro.p1

SALLUST was born at

intro.p1

Amiternum

intro.p1

, a town in the

intro.p1

Sabine

intro.p1

territory, on the first of October,

intro.p1

1

intro.p1

in the year six hundred and sixty-six

intro.p1

2

intro.p1

from the foundation of

intro.p1

Rome

intro.p1

, eighty-seven years before Christ, and in the seventh consulship of Marius.

intro.p2

The name of his father was Caius Sallustius;

intro.p2

1

intro.p2

that of his mother is unknown. His family was thought by Crinitus, and some others, to have been patrician, but by

intro.p2

Gerlach

intro.p2

, and most of the later critics, is pronounced to have been plebeian, because he held the office of tribune of the people, because he makes observations unfavorable to the nobility in his writings, and because his grandson, according to Tacitus,

intro.p2

2

intro.p2

was only of equestrian rank.

intro.p3

The ingenuity of criticism has been exercised in determining whether his name should be written with a double or single l. Jerome Wolfius,

intro.p3

1

intro.p3

and

intro.p3

Gerlach

intro.p3

, are in favor of the single letter, depending chiefly on inscriptions, and on the presumption that the name is derived from

intro.p3

salus

intro.p3

or

intro.p3

sal

intro.p3

. But inscriptions vary; the etymology of the word is uncertain, and to derive it from

intro.p3

sal

intro.p3

would authorize either mode of spelling. All the Latin authors, both in prose and poetry, have the name with the double letter, and it seems better, as Vossius

intro.p3

2

intro.p3

remarks, to adhere to their practice. Among the Greeks, Dion and Eusebius have the single letter; in some other writers it is found doubled.

intro.p4

Another question raised respecting his name, is whether he

intro.p4

should be called

intro.p4

Sallustius Crispus

intro.p4

or

intro.p4

Crispus Sallustius.

intro.p4

The latter mode is adopted by Le Clerc, Cortius, Havercamp, and some other critics; but De Brosses

intro.p4

1

intro.p4

argues conclusively in favor of the former method; as Sallustius, from its termination, is evidently the name of the family or

intro.p4

gens;

intro.p4

and Crispus, which denotes

intro.p4

quelque habitude du corps,

intro.p4

only a surname to distinguish one of its branches.

intro.p4

Crispus Sallustius

intro.p4

is found, indeed, in manuscripts; and, according to Cortius, in the best; but on what reasonable grounds can it be justified? It was perhaps adopted by some copyist front the ode of

intro.p4

Horace

intro.p4

2

intro.p4

addressed to Sallist's nephew, and inconsiderately continued by his successors.

intro.p5

He was removed early in life to

intro.p5

Rome

intro.p5

, that he might be educated under Atteius Prætextatus, a celebrated grammarian of that age, who styled himself Philologus, and who was afterward tutor to Asinius Pollio.

intro.p5

1

intro.p5

Atteius treated Sallust with very great distinction.

intro.p5

2

intro.p6

He may be supposed to have soon grown conscious of his powers;

intro.p6

1

intro.p6

and appears at an early period of his life to have devoted himself to study, with an intention to distinguish himself in history.

intro.p6

2

intro.p7

His devotion to literature, however, was not so great as to detain him from indulgence in pleasure; for he became, if we allow any credit to the old declaimer, infamous,

intro.p7

ætatis tirocinio,

intro.p7

for debauchery and extravagance. He took possession of his father's house in his father's lifetime, and sold it; an act by which he brought his father to the grave; and he was twice, for some misconduct, arraigned before the magistrates, and escaped on both occasions only through the perjury of his judges.

intro.p7

1

intro.p8

When we cite this rhetorician, we must not forget that we cite an anonymous reviler, yet we must suppose with Gerlach, and with Meisner, the German translator of Sallust, that we quote a writer who grounded his invectives on reports and opinions current at the time in which he lived.

intro.p9

Sallust next thought of aspiring to political distinction;

intro.p9

1

intro.p9

but

intro.p9

"the usual method of attaining notice," says De Brosses,

intro.p9

2

intro.p9

"which was to secure friends and clients by pleading the causes of individuals at the bar, he seems not to have adopted;" since, as is known, no orations spoken' by him are in existence, and, as is thought, no mention is made of such orations in any other author.

intro.p10

Mention, however, is made of orations of Sallust, at whatever time delivered, in the well-known passage of

intro.p10

Seneca

intro.p10

the rhetorician.

intro.p10

1

intro.p10

When

intro.p10

Seneca

intro.p10

inquired of Cassius Severus, why he, who was so eminent in pleading important causes, displayed so little talent in pronouncing fictitious declamations, the orator replied,

intro.p10

Quod in me miraris, pene omnibus evenit, etc. Orationes Sallustii in honorem historiarum leguntur.

intro.p10

"What you think extraordinary in me, is common to all men of ability. The greatest geniuses, to whom I am conscious of my great inferiority, have generally excelled only in one species of composition. The felicity of

intro.p10

Virgil

intro.p10

in poetry deserted him in prose; the eloquence of

intro.p10

Cicero

intro.p10

's orations is not to be found in his verses; and the speeches of Sallust are read only as a foil to his histories." The speeches which are here meant, are not, as has been generally imagined, those inserted in the histories, but others, which Sallust had spoken. This view of the passage was first taken by Antonius Augustinus, and communicated by him to Schottus, who mentioned it in his annotations on

intro.p10

Seneca

intro.p10

.

intro.p10

2

intro.p11

But by whatever means he secured support, he had at length sufficient interest to obtain a quæstorship;

intro.p11

1

intro.p11

the tenure of which gave him admission into the senate. It would appear that he was about thirty-one years of age when he attained this honor.

intro.p11

2

intro.p12

It must have been about this period that his adventure with Fausta, the daughter of Sylla and wife of

intro.p12

Milo

intro.p12

, occurred, of which a short account is given by Aulus Gellius

intro.p12

1

intro.p12

in an extract from Varro. The English reader may take it in the version of Beloe : "Marcus Varro, a man of great authority and weight in his writings and life, in his publication entitled 'Pius,' or 'De Pace,'

intro.p12

records that Caius Sallust, the author of that grave and serious composition (

intro.p12

seriæ illius et severæ orationis

intro.p12

), in which he has exercised the severity of the censorial office, in taking cognizance of crimes, being taken by Annæus

intro.p12

Milo

intro.p12

in adultery, was well scourged, and, after paying a sum of money, dismissed." The same story is told, on the authority of Asconius Pedianus the biographer of Sallust, by Acro and Porphyrio, the scholiasts on Horace, who, they think, had it in his mind when he wrote the words,

intro.p12

Ille flagellis ad mortem cæsus.

intro.p12

2

intro.p12

Servius, also, in his note on

intro.p12

Quique ob adulterium cæsi,

intro.p12

in the sixth book of the Æneid,

intro.p12

3

intro.p12

tells a like tale, adding that Sallust entered the house in the habit of a slave, and was caught in that disguise by

intro.p12

Milo

intro.p12

.

intro.p13

Such being the case, it is not wonderful that when Sallust entered on his tribuneship of the people, to which lie was elected in the year of the city seven hundred, he seized an opportunity which occurred of being revenged on

intro.p13

Milo

intro.p13

, who had shortly before killed Clodius. He joined with his colleagues, Pompeins Rufus and Plancus, in inflaming the populace, and charging Milo with premeditated hostility.

intro.p13

1

intro.p13

They intimidated

intro.p13

Cicero

intro.p13

,

intro.p13

Milo

intro.p13

's advocate, insinuating that he had planned the assassination;

intro.p13

2

intro.p13

and the matter ended in

intro.p13

Milo

intro.p13

's banishment.

intro.p13

3

intro.p13

During the progress of the trial, however, it is said that Sallust abated his hostility to

intro.p13

Milo

intro.p13

and

intro.p13

Cicero

intro.p13

, and even became friendly with them.

intro.p13

4

intro.p13

How this reconciliation was effected, does not appear; but it seems certain that

intro.p13

Cicero

intro.p13

, when he attacked Plancus, Sallust's colleague, for exciting the populace to turbulence, left Sallust himself unmolested.

intro.p13

5

intro.p14

Unmolested, however, lie did not long remain; for in the year of the city seven hundred and four, in the censorship of Appius Claudius Pulcher, and Lucius Calpurnius Piso, Appius, actuated by two motives, one of which was to serve Pompey, by excluding from the senate such as were hostile to him,

intro.p14

1

intro.p14

and the other to throw into the shade his own private irregularities by

intro.p14

an ostentatious discharge of his public duties,

intro.p14

2

intro.p14

expelled Sallust from the senate on pretence that he was a flagrantly immoral character.

intro.p14

3

intro.p15

But Appius, by this proceeding, instead of serving Pompey, served Cæsar; for many who had previously been favorable to Pompey, or had continued neutral, betook themselves immediately to Cæsar's camp; in the number of whom was Sallust.

intro.p15

1

intro.p16

His attendance on Cæsar did not go unrewarded; for when Cæsar returned from

intro.p16

Spain

intro.p16

, after his victory over Afranius and Petreius, he restored Sallust, with others under similar circumstances,

intro.p16

1

intro.p16

to his seat in the senate; and as it was not usual for a senator, who had been degraded from his rank, to be reinstated in it without being at the same time elected to an office, he was again made quæstor,

intro.p16

2

intro.p16

or, as

intro.p16

Dion

intro.p16

thinks, prætor.

intro.p17

He was then intrusted with some military command, and sent into

intro.p17

Illyria

intro.p17

, where, as Orosius

intro.p17

1

intro.p17

states, he was one of those that were defeated by the Pomnpeian leaders Octavius and Libo.

intro.p18

Afterward, when the war in

intro.p18

Egypt

intro.p18

and

intro.p18

Asia

intro.p18

was finished, but while the remains of Pompey's army, headed by Scipio and Cato, were still menacing hostilities in

intro.p18

Africa

intro.p18

, Sallust, with the title of prætor, was directed to conduct against them a body of troops from

intro.p18

Campania

intro.p18

.

intro.p18

1

intro.p18

But Sallust was intrusted with more than he was able to perform. The soldiers mutinied on the coast, compelled him to flee, and hurried away to

intro.p18

Rome

intro.p18

, putting to death two senators in their way., It was on this occasion that Cæsar humbled them by addressing them as

intro.p18

Quirites

intro.p18

instead of

intro.p18

commilitones.

intro.p18

2

intro.p19

Sallust was then reinstated in command, and was sent, during the African war, to the island of

intro.p19

Cercina

intro.p19

, to bring off a quantity of corn that had been deposited there by the enemy; a commission which he successfully executed.

intro.p19

1

intro.p20

Whether he performed any other service for Cæsar in this

intro.p20

war, we have no account; but Cæsar, when it was ended, thought him a person of such consequence, that he gave him the government of

intro.p20

Numidia

intro.p20

, with the title of pro-consul. "He received the province from Cæsar," says

intro.p20

Dion

intro.p20

, "nominally to govern it, but in reality to ravage and plunder it." Whether such was Cæsar's intention or not, it is generally believed that he enriched himself by the spoil of it to the greatest possible extent.

intro.p20

1

intro.p21

When his term of office, which seems to have been only a year, was expired, he "appeared at

intro.p21

Rome

intro.p21

," says the declaimer, "like a man enriched in a dream." But the Numidians followed him, and accused him of extortion; a charge front which he was only acquitted through the interposition of Cæsar,

intro.p21

1

intro.p21

to whom he is said to have presented a bribe.

intro.p21

2

intro.p22

The trial had not been long concluded when Cæsar was assassinated, and Sallust, being thus deprived of his patron, seems to have withdrawn entirely from public life. He purchased a large tract of ground on the Quirinal hill, where he erected a splendid mansion, and laid out those magnificent gardens of which so much has been related. Their extent must have been vast, if De Brosses, who visited the spot in

intro.p22

1739

intro.p22

, obtained any just notion of it.

intro.p22

1

intro.p22

But some have thought them much smaller. He had also a country-house at

intro.p22

Tibur

intro.p22

, which had belonged to Julius Cæsar.

intro.p22

2

intro.p23

It was during this period of retirement, as is supposed, that he married Terentia, the divorced wife of Cicero, if, indeed, he married her at all; for their union rests on no very strong testimony.

intro.p23

1

intro.p24

It was at this time, too, it would appear, that he commenced the composition of history, with a view to the perpetuation of his name; for he entered on it, lie says, when his mind was free from "hope, fear, or political partisanship;"

intro.p24

1

intro.p24

and to no other time of his life are such expressions applicable.

intro.p24

Dion

intro.p24

seems to have supposed

intro.p24

that he appeared as a historian before he went to

intro.p24

Numidia

intro.p24

, but is in all probability mistaken.

intro.p25

Sallust died on the thirteenth of May, in the year of the city seven hundred and eighteen, in the fifty-second year of his age,

intro.p25

1

intro.p25

leaving his grand-nephew, Gains Sallustius Crispus, whom want of children had induced him to adopt, heir to all his possessions. His gardens, some years after his death, became imperial property.

intro.p25

2

intro.p26

Such were the events, as far as we learn, of the life of Sallust; and such is the notion which the voice of antiquity teaches us to form of his moral character. In modern times, some attempts have been made to prove that he was less vicious than he was anciently represented.

intro.p27

Among those who have attempted to clear him of the charges usually brought against hin, are Miller,

intro.p27

1

intro.p27

Wieland,

intro.p27

2

intro.p27

and Roos;

intro.p27

3

intro.p27

who are strenuously opposed by Gerlach

intro.p27

4

intro.p27

and Loebell.

intro.p27

5

intro.p27

The points on which his champions chiefly endeavor to defend him, are the adventure with Fausta, and the spoliation of

intro.p27

Numidia

intro.p27

. Of the three, Miller is the most enterprising. With regard to the affair of Fausta, he sets himself boldly to impugn the authority of Varro or Gellius, on which it chiefly rests; and his reasoning is as follows: That such writers as Gellius are not always to be trusted; that Gellius often quoted from memory; that he cites old authors on the testimony of later authors; that he speaks of Varro,

intro.p27

fide homo multâ et gravis,

intro.p27

as if he were a cotemporary that needed commendation, not the well-known Varro whose character was established; that the Varro of Gellius may therefore be a later Varro, whose book, "Pius," or "De Pace," may have been about Antoninus Pius, under whom Gellius lived, and who may have been utterly mistaken in what he said of Sallust; and that, consequently, the passage in Gellius is to be suspected. Respecting the plunder of

intro.p27

Numidia

intro.p27

, his arguments are, that the

intro.p27

province was given to Sallust to spoil, not for himself, but for Cæsar; that of the money obtained from it, the chief part was given to Cæsar; and that, consequently, Cæsar, not Sallust, is to bear the blame for what was done.

intro.p28

But such conjectures produce no more impression on the mind of a reader than Walpole's " Historic Doubts" concerning Richard the Third. They suggest something that may have been, but bring no proof of what actually was; they may be allowed to be ingenious, but the general voice of history is still believed. To all Müller's suggestions Gerlach exclaims, Credat Judæus! Were there, in the pages of antiquity, a single record or remark favorable to the moral character of Sallust, there would then be a point d'appui from which to commence an attack on what is said against him; but the case, alas! is exactly the reverse; wherever Sallust is characterized as a man, he is characterized unfavorably.

intro.p29

His writings consisted of his narratives of the Conspiracy of Catiline and the War with Jugurtha, and of a History of Rome in five books, extending from the death of Sylla to the beginning of the Mithridatic war. The Catiline and Jugurtha have reached us entire; but of the History there now remain only four speeches, two letters, and a number of smaller fragments preserved among the grammarians. That he was not the author of the Epistles to Cæsar, the reader will find satisfactorily shown in the remarks prefixed to the translation of them in the present volume.

intro.p30

Sallust is supposed to have formed his style on that of Thucydides;

intro.p30

1

intro.p30

but he has far excelled his model, if not in energy, certainly in conciseness and perspicuity, of expression. "The speeches of Thucydides," says Cicero,

intro.p30

2

intro.p30

"contain so many dark and intricate passages, that they are scarcely understood." No such complaint can be made of any part of the writings of Sallust. "From any sentence in Thucydides," says

intro.p30

Seneca

intro.p30

the rhetorician,

intro.p30

3

intro.p30

"however remarkable for its conciseness, if a word or two be taken away, the sense will remain, if not equally ornate, yet equally entire; but from the periods of Sallust nothing can be

intro.p30

deducted without detriment to the meaning."

intro.p30

Apud eruditas aures,

intro.p30

says Quintilian,

intro.p30

4

intro.p30

nihil potest esse perfectius.

intro.p31

The defects of his style are, that he wants the

intro.p31

flumen orationis

intro.p31

so much admired in Livy and Herodotus;

intro.p31

1

intro.p31

that his transitions are often abrupt; and that he too much affects antique phraseology.

intro.p31

2

intro.p31

But no writer can combine qualities that are incompatible. He is justly preferred by Quintilian

intro.p31

3

intro.p31

to Livy, and well merits the praise given him by Tacitus

intro.p31

4

intro.p31

and Martial,

intro.p31

5

intro.p31

of being

intro.p31

rerum Romanarum florentissimus auctor,

intro.p31

and

intro.p31

Romanâ primus in historiâ.

intro.p32

Of the numerous editions of Sallust, that of Cortius, which appeared at Leipsic in 1724, and has been often reprinted, long indisputably held the first rank. But Cortius, as an editor, was somewhat too fond of expelling from his text all words that he could possibly pronounce superfluous; and succeeding editors, as Gerlach (Basil. 1823), Kritz (Leipsic, 1834), and Dietsch (Leipsic, 1846), have judiciously restored many words that he had discarded, and produced texts more acceptable in many respects to the generality of students.

intro.p33

Sallust has been many times translated into English. The versions most deserving notice are those of Gordon (1744), Rose (1751), Murphy (1809), and Peacock (1845.) Gordon has vigor, but wants polish; Rose is close and faithful but often dry and hard; Murphy is sprightly, but verbose and licentious, qualities in which his admirer, Sir Henry Steuart (1806), went audaciously beyond him; Mr. Peacock's translation is equally faithful with that of Rose, and far exceeds it in general ease and agreeableness of style.

Reader

Word analysis

Intertext edge

Note